加中人口资源结构经济互补性(Emigrant China and Immigrant Canada)

Xiaoming Guo 郭晓明

 

图:一战以后,加拿大把歧视性人头税改为完全禁止华人移民。

 

According to the law of diffusion: people migrate from areas of a high population density to areas of low population density. Not only Chinese, Europeans, and Indians migrate to North America too. If India is so democratic and free, why they migrate to Canada more than the Chinese do?

China has one-fifth of the world’s population, yet it has only 7% of the world’s cultivatable lands. The market economy will facilitate the flows of elements of production. Resources such as land in not movable. Economy production is a combination of labor, capital, and resource. Canada has a territory larger than that of China, yet a population less than 0.5% of the world. The market force is strong in allocating resources to maximize growth. It is an economic phenomenon that Canada is a net immigration country and China just as many other Asian countries is a net emigration country. Many Chinese emigrate to developed countries thanks to China for its adaptation of market economy and becoming an open and free country so that people can migrate to find their living and jobs worldwide.

However, Canada restricts Chinese immigrate to Canada by quota. It allocates a quota of immigrants from China about the same level as from the Philippines and the UK. If Canada is a truly free country and lets the free market work, it should let the market allocate the world labor and should accept immigrants approximately mapping the world demography and the diffusion law. Canada has a legacy of the Chinese Exclusion Act to restrict the Chinese from freedom of migration. If Canada does let the market allocate the labor, it should have about 20% of its immigrants come from China.

If Canada really thinks the Chinese are oppressed in China, it should not deport illegal Chinese immigrants but grant them refugee status. Canada does accept many irregular immigrants for humanitarian reasons, yet no of them are from China where the Canadian government considered has human rights violations. By deporting illegal Chinese immigrants, Canada actually knows, with its intelligence network of Five Eyes, that the Chinese human rights condition is good that deporting illegal Chinese immigrants does not violate human rights conditions.

Chinese have more freedom in China because it is the developed countries that put restrictions blocking Chinese people from freedom of migration. The western soft Berlin Wall is the government interference to the market to alter the labor distribution with systematic racism.

 

根据扩散定律:人们从人口密度高的地区迁移到人口密度低的地区。不仅中国人、欧洲人和印第安人也移民到了北美。如果印度非常民主和自由,为什么他们会比中国人更多地移民到加拿大呢?

中国拥有世界人口的五分之一,但只有世界上7%的可耕地。市场经济促进生产要素的流动。土地等资源不可移动。经济生产是劳动、资本和资源的结合。加拿大的领土比中国的要大,但人口却不到世界人口的0.5%。市场力量在分配资源以最大化增长方面很强大。加拿大是一个移民净流入国,而中国是一个移民净流出国,和许多其他亚洲国家一样,这是一种经济现象。许多中国人移民到发达国家,这要感谢中国适应市场经济,成为一个开放和自由的国家,以便人们可以迁移到世界各地找到他们的生活和工作。

然而,加拿大通过配额限制中国人移民到加拿大,中国移民配额与菲律宾和英国的移民水平大致相同。如果加拿大是一个真正自由的国家,让自由市场发挥其作用,应该让市场分配世界劳动力,并接受大致绘制世界人口统计和扩散法的移民。加拿大曾有《排华法案》来限制中国人的移民自由。如果加拿大真的让市场分配劳动力,应该有大约20%的移民来自中国。

如果加拿大真的认为中国人在中国受到压迫,它就不应该驱逐来自中国的非法移民,而应该给予他们难民身份。加拿大确实因为人道主义原因接受了许多非正规移民,但没有一个来自加拿大政府认为侵犯人权的中国。通过驱逐非法中国移民,拥有五眼情报网络的加拿大确实知道,中国的人权条件是好的,驱逐非法中国移民不会违反人权条款。

中国给予中国人更多的迁移自由。限制中国人迁移自由的恰恰是发达国家。西部软柏林墙是政府对市场的干预,用系统性的种族主义改变劳动力分配。